Fair
87°
St. Charles, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Sound Off: Have respect for others

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

The opposite way
Barack Obama has another negative ad hitting the airwaves. He has nothing positive to say about himself, so his latest propaganda clip attacks Mitt Romney for not paying enough in income taxes. Obama attempts to foment anger toward Romney by taxpayers for paying “only” 14 percent of his income to the government. Obama doesn’t mention in the ad that 14 percent of Mitt Romney’s income amounts to $2,800,000 on an income of $20 million. Also, Obama doesn’t mention that he believes that someone lucky enough to earn $20 million should be forced to pay $10 million to our spendthrift politicians. Obama’s ad doesn’t mention that Mitt Romney paid the required amount he owed and doesn’t mention that most of Romney’s income is in the form of investment gains. That means that the earnings he has now come from income that was previously taxed at much higher tax rates. In essence, he is paying double taxation on his current income. As usual, Barack Obama understands the situation in the opposite way that it should be. People able to invest money that they have left over from their taxed wages shouldn’t face higher tax rates but preferably they should not be taxed at all on earnings they make by taking on investment risk. Does Barack Obama have any other ideas for growing our economy other than taxing the rich, squandering money on green energy and printing more food stamps? Those ideas don’t generate economic growth in any conventional economics book printed outside of Havana. Hopefully more than 50 percent of our population will understand that come Nov. 6.

Outside the box
I see the 2012 assessments are out, and my taxes are going up. Can we think outside the box? Rather than raising my taxes to pay the teachers, we could give them a house that has been foreclosed on for not paying taxes, in lieu of a pay raise. I have three on my street. You can add free housing to your list.

Funds have better use
Today is Aug. 12, and I don't know if other people, like me, have noticed all of these military helicopters flying low over our houses, protecting President Obama, and here they talk about cutting taxes for the middle class and education and all this stuff. And I'd like to know why Mr. Obama can't run on his record, rather than gallivanting around at $40,000 a person to have pope attend a fundraiser. I'd like to see that money to pay down the debt and I would also like an accounting of how much it has cost the U.S. taxpayers and civil service and the Department of Defense for protection of Mr. Obama while he's driving around all over the country, raising funds. I thought there was supposed to be a difference between funds in office and the funds in politics, and I can't understand. Why do we allow people who are currently in office, especially the president, when it costs probably millions of dollars, to fly those military helicopters? And why don't all you people look up the administration budget and see why Mrs. Obama has a budget.

Comments

About the Author

KCC Readers

St. Charles, IL

editorial@kcchronicle.com

"Sound Off" allows Kane County Chronicle readers to speak on topics anonymously. The comments on the blog are the opinions or our readers and, as such, should not be taken as fact.

Follow this blog:

Get updates from this blog when they happen by following it on Twitter or using its RSS feed.


Reader Poll

Do you support allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes?

Yes
No
I have no opinion