Fair
44°
St. Charles, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Letter: Elections are awash in special interest money

To the Editor:

I am writing to urge Kane County voters to vote yes for the advisory question on the Nov. 6 ballot. The question on the ballot reads: Should the United States Constitution be amended to limit the use of corporate, special interest and private money in any political activity, including influencing the election of any candidate for public office.

For many years, states and the federal government have been able to control campaign financing. In 2010, the Supreme Court – in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – ruled that the first amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political contributions from corporations and unions. As a result of this decision, Super PACs can accept unlimited and undisclosed contributions from individuals, corporations and other special interests. Now we have Super PACs with no accountability and billionaires footing the bill for candidates. Our elections are awash in money. Estimates by the Center for Responsive Politics are that about $6 billion will be spent in this election cycle on congressional and presidential races. This is up from about $3 billion in 2000.

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com


Reader Poll

Do you agree with the Boy Scouts' decision to accept gay Scouts but not gay Scout leaders?

Yes, it is appropriate
Both gay Scouts and Scout leaders should be accepted
Neither gay Scouts nor Scout leaders should be accepted
I have no opinion