Fair
60°
St. Charles, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Judge again tosses MacRunnels suit vs. McConnaughay

GENEVA – A Kane County judge again has tossed out of court a lawsuit brought against Kane County's outgoing board chairman over raises she gave several county department heads.

Tuesday, following a hearing at the Kane County Courthouse in Geneva, Kane County Judge Thomas Mueller dismissed the suit brought by Elburn resident James MacRunnels against Kane County Board Chairman Karen McConnaughay.

In his order, Mueller ruled in favor of McConnaughay and against MacRunnels "on all counts of the complaint."

MacRunnels had pursued the case since 2010, alleging McConnaughay violated county ordinances when she awarded pay raises to 14 county officials and department heads without first submitting the raises to the County Board for approval.

The case was dismissed initially by Mueller. But MacRunnels appealed, and the appellate court ordered the Kane County judge to again consider it.

Lawyers hired by the county to defend McConnaughay argued that McConnaughay had not violated the ordinances, as the raises were approved by the County Board when they approved the annual county budgets.

Mueller ultimately sided with McConnaughay over MacRunnels, a political rival of McConnaughay's who had unsuccessfully challenged her in the 2008 Republican primary election for County Board chairman.

McConnaughay is serving out the final weeks of her term as County Board chairman, as she was elected on Nov. 6 to the Illinois State Senate.

State Sen. Chris Lauzen, of Aurora, has been elected to replace her and will take office in December.

In a statement released following the ruling, McConnaughay trumpeted the ruling dismissing what she has maintained from the beginning was a politically motivated lawsuit.

She said the order "has provided validation of the process" the county followed in awarding the pay raises.

"My detractors simply sought a way to try and derail county government and embarrass me in the process," McConnaughay said in the prepared statement. "Once again, their efforts completely failed, and unfortunately the taxpayers got stuck with the bill."

MacRunnels said he will discuss with his lawyer whether he again should appeal.

But he said the ruling did not surprise him, as he had sought a change of venue so he could find "a fair shake" that he did not believe would be awarded him in Kane County's courts.

"This whole thing has been a travesty," MacRunnels said. "But I need to figure out how much more of my money I want to waste on this."

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com


Reader Poll

Will you attend a Memorial Day ceremony?

Yes
No
I'm not sure