Partly Cloudy
55°
St. Charles, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

Musick: Trestman no longer anonymous

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

After that came a three-year stint as offensive coordinator with Jake Plummer and the Arizona Cardinals (1998-2000), followed by two seasons in the same role with Rich Gannon and the Oakland Raiders (2002-03).

Almost everywhere, Trestman’s offenses enjoyed success.

So why did he end up in Canada?

We should learn more about Trestman’s journey today when he is introduced at Halas Hall. Changing jobs is common in the NFL, but what’s more unusual is a team investing its Super Bowl hopes in a 57-year-old with no previous NFL head coaching experience and who has been out of the league since 2004.

Today, I’m hoping to hear specifics from Trestman about his plans to repair a broken offense and to help Jay Cutler develop into a top-tier quarterback.

In the meantime, Trestman’s track record offers reasons for optimism.

Based on Trestman’s past stints in San Francisco and elsewhere, expect the Bears to install a version of the pro-style “West Coast” offense that includes plenty of passing and little (if any) read-option plays. Matt Forte could be used more as a receiver out of the backfield. Cutler could roll out of the pocket with greater frequency.

In terms of Mikes, the Bears’ new offense could resemble more Martz than Tice.

Yet Trestman arrives with a much friendlier reputation than the “Mad Scientist” Martz, who stubbornly tried to jam his offensive scheme on the roster he inherited. Trestman is more likely to adapt his scheme to the strengths of his players while his reported offensive coordinator, ex-New Orleans Saints assistant Aaron Kromer, works on improving an offensive line that long has been one of the worst in the NFL.

Trestman’s tenure in relative obscurity ended Wednesday.

The cameras start rolling today.

• Tom Musick covers the Bears for Shaw Media. Contact him at tmusick@shawmedia.com.

||2|Next Page

Reader Poll

Do you support allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes?

Yes
No
I have no opinion